{"id":6203,"date":"2022-09-17T19:49:43","date_gmt":"2022-09-18T02:49:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/notordinary.org\/?p=6203"},"modified":"2022-09-17T19:49:43","modified_gmt":"2022-09-18T02:49:43","slug":"tweet-from-djw172-at-september-11-2022-at-0720am","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/notordinary.org\/2022\/09\/17\/tweet-from-djw172-at-september-11-2022-at-0720am\/","title":{"rendered":"Tweet from djw172 at September 11, 2022 at 07:20AM"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

If a tobacco company had invented a cigarette that was less harmful to smokers but caused significantly more harm to others via second-hand smoke, I think it would have been (at minimum) pretty controversial. The equivalent innovation with cars, though? Not even a little bit. https:\/\/t.co\/aCTN0N13Y4<\/p>\n

— David Watkins (@djw172)
\n <\/i>Sep 11, 2022<\/a>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n